Customers and staff are a company’s most valuable resources. Products and services can’t be made without workers. There can be no sales of goods and services if there are no clients. However, neither of these items appears on the financial accounts of most businesses. Such gaps in customer service for midsize companies are not good.
Companies seldom assess the worth of their staff or customers, opting instead to track things like customer acquisition and employee turnover. In addition, the quality of one’s interactions with a company influences how loyal its workers or customers are.
While studies show that 80% of businesses feel they offer exceptional customer and employee experiences, just 20% of those who interact with them really agree. The question is why the two numbers don’t match. Companies often fail to adequately evaluate the quality of customer service they give. Organizations may see there is work to be done when they put themselves in the shoes of their consumers and workers.
Causes of Gaps in Customer Service
One of the primary causes of poor customer service is that businesses are too focused on generating a profit to care about the customers’ needs. Customers today are a “new breed,” one that is more discerning, better educated, and seemingly less patient than their predecessors. As a result of these factors, consumers have become considerably pickier and less patient, expecting that businesses cater to their specific wants and requirements and do it with a high level of professionalism.
These days, it’s impossible for a business to compete based only on the quality of its products alone. The company’s focus must also be on satisfying the clients’ psychological requirements. Service to customers is no longer an afterthought; it is integral to every facet of a business’ operations. Disparities in customer service emerge when businesses fall behind their customers’ shifting expectations and are unable to meet them.
To succeed, businesses must always be thinking about and working toward the goal of providing exceptional service and increased value to their customers. In today’s cutthroat market, a company’s customer service may make or break its ability to attract and retain consumers, even if its products are among the best available. In order to spot and correct customer service flaws, businesses need to put in place the appropriate tools and procedures.
The term “customer service gap” refers to the discrepancy between your customers’ expectations and their actual experiences. How may these occurrences take place? How come so many organizations have voids in their service? How can you mend them, anyway? We’ll address all of your concerns below.
The management perception-customer expectation gap is the discord between what top executives believe their consumers want and what they actually want from their company. If there isn’t enough data on what matters most to customers, that void will persist. For instance, the leadership of a restaurant may falsely assume that diners are interested in quick service and affordable rates when, in reality, those they serve would rather have more options and higher-quality products. That’s because what management thinks customers want isn’t often what they want at all.
This void can be filled via market research. Surveys, in-person interviews, and paying closer attention to customer feedback are just a few of the numerous methods available for learning what matters most to your target audience. Managers may learn a lot with little effort and expense by talking to consumers face-to-face or by seeing how staff engage with customers. Customer satisfaction surveys are another useful tool for gathering insights into what consumers value most in the services provided to them. Prior to making any changes to a product or service, or in response to any signs of consumer discontent, it may be prudent for firms to perform market research.
Ineffective expectations communication between a manager and their staff is the root cause of the disconnect between management perspective and service quality. The manager here knows exactly what kind of service the client requires. While they plan to execute quality standards properly, they fail to adequately communicate them to the team. The management of a dental office, for instance, may be aware that patients have a right to expect to have their calls returned within a reasonable amount of time, and may instruct receptionists to this effect without stipulating how many rings are considered appropriate.
The gap can be reduced if management issues explicit instructions and establishes clear quality benchmarks. Often, a good approach to do this is by establishing quantitative benchmarks. Employees may be instructed to answer the phone on the third ring rather than immediately. Creating and maintaining detailed procedural documentation might also prove useful. Because of this, the possibility of accidentally leaving out information or misinterpreting it owing to a lack of context is reduced.
The quality of the management’s service standards and the quality of the actual customer experience is the difference between service quality and service delivery. It is the manager’s responsibility to interpret the customer’s feedback and relay that information to the service staff. Team members are aware of the required quality of service yet fall short of management’s expectations. The management of a fast food restaurant, for instance, could require that each order be completed within a certain amount of time, yet workers there might not be able to keep up with the pace.
A manager can help bridge this divide by providing appropriate training. Proper training may assist guarantee that team members can provide service that is consistent with expectations when a new employee joins the team or when a new service standard is implemented. Management should keep an eye on service quality, either by direct supervision or by listening to comments from customers, to see if employees are living up to expectations and providing further training if necessary. By thoroughly assessing job applicants and selecting those who possess the abilities essential to satisfy service quality criteria, management may also close this gap throughout the hiring process.
When the amount of quality a company advertises or promises to consumers differs from the level of quality the firm really offers, a service quality and external communication gap exists. Intentional or unintentional overpromising or underdelivering on the promised quality of a company’s services can lead to this discrepancy. When compared to its larger competitors, a small retail outlet’s limited purchasing power results in higher costs and a narrower variety of products.
Keeping advertisements and conversations with potential buyers grounded in reality is a simple method to close this gap. Every business has both areas in which it excels and others in which it is less effective. Smaller shops may not have the best deals or the most range, but they may provide more personalized attention to their customers. Managers may attempt to prevent overpromising on service quality by taking their time in creating marketing materials and consulting with team members, if needed, to see if the company can actually provide the level of service promised.
The service quality a client anticipates and the service quality they actually receive is the service quality expectation experience gap. When this occurs, it means that the company’s management has effectively established the service standard that their consumers demand and that their employees are providing service that is up to par with those expectations. The consumer has a negative experience despite receiving service that satisfies both management’s standards and the average customer’s expectations.
A gas station attendant could say hello, fill up a customer’s tank, wipe off the windshield, and inquire about car wash services. The employee is meeting management’s expectations for service quality based on their knowledge of what customers want, but the client is still feeling uneasy because of their negative past experiences with high-pressure sales tactics. The gap may be closed by persistently asking for input from customers. Businesses may learn a lot about what their clients desire by finding out what they like and don’t like about the service they receive.
If you want to close the gaps in consumer expectations, you need to study what people anticipate from your business when they visit your shop or browse your website and how much they anticipate spending. While it is impossible to completely satisfy every customer, working to do so might increase revenue and bring in new clients. If you don’t fill up these gaps, you risk losing customers, getting a poor name, and going out of business.
Start Your Free Trial Today!
Find out how easy it is to improve your customer support and save time for FREE!